Dosimetric comparison between carotid-sparing IMRT and 3DCRT in early glottic cancer patients treated with definitive radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric benefits of carotid-sparing IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy) over 3DCRT (three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy) in early glottic cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with histologically proven early-stage squamous cell cancer of glottis (T1N0), treated with definitive radiotherapy, were selected retrospectively for the dosimetric analysis. Patients were originally treated with 3DCRT technique. For comparison purpose, IMRT plans were generated for each patient. Dosimetric comparison was done between two techniques (IMRT and 3DCRT) in terms of PTV (planning target volume) coverage, HI (homogeneity index), CI (conformity index), and doses to right carotid artery, left carotid artery, and spinal cord. RESULTS: V95% for the PTV was higher in IMRT plans (98.26%) as compared to 3DCRT plans (95.12%) (P-value <0.001), whereas V105% for PTV was significantly higher in 3DCRT plans (16.77%) as compared to IMRT plans (0.32%) (P-value 0.11). In terms of both HI and CI, IMRT plans showed better conformity as compared to 3DCRT plans, with statistically significant difference. Both right and left carotid arteries' average mean and maximum doses were significantly lower in IMRT plans as compared to 3DCRT plans (P-value <0.001). IMRT plans resulted in significant carotid-sparing as compared to 3DCRT plans in terms of V35 and V50 (P-value <0.001). CONCLUSION: Carotid-sparing IMRT resulted in better PTV coverage and lower carotid artery dose as compared to 3DCRT in early glottic cancer patients.

Comparative Analysis of VMAT and IMRT Techniques: Evaluation of Dose Constraints and Bone Marrow Sparing in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the cervix is a globally significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, a standard approach for locally advanced cervical cancer, invariably involves pelvic irradiation. Although this strategy is effective, it inevitably affects the pelvic bone marrow, a crucial hematopoietic site, and leads to hematological toxicity The potential of IMRT to spare bone marrow in pelvic irradiation settings has been an area of significant interest, with the aim to mitigate the hematological toxicity associated with pelvic radiotherapy. Radiotherapy techniques have evolved in terms of conformity and normal tissue sparing. Our study intends to explore the use of BM sparing techniques among patients of carcinoma cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients of carcinoma cervix FIGO Stage IIIB treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy were selected for this study. The external contour of bones was delineated on planning CT as a surrogate for BM. We generated three plans on a single patient:1. without BM as the dose constraint, namely N-IMRT plan; 2. with BM constraint, namely BMS-IMRT plan; 3. VMAT plan in which BM constraint was given. The dose volume histogram (DVH) for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed. BM parameters: V10, V20, V30, V40, mean, maximum and minimum dose were compared.  Results: PTV coverage was comparable in all techniques. VMAT plans resulted in superior BM sparing compared with N-IMRT plan (P-<0.001) and BMS-IMRT plan (P-<0.001, 0.021 and 0.001 respectively for V20, V30 and V40). VMAT plans had better CI compared with BMS-IMRT (P-0.002) and N-IMRT (P-0.001) plans. CONCLUSION: Our study adds to the growing evidence that VMAT might be the preferred technique for patients with carcinoma of the cervix undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy, as it provides comparable target coverage and better sparing of bone marrow compared to IMRT.

Assessing the Patient Outcomes and Performance of a Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (CTVS) Unit During Its First Two Years in a Tier-2 City in India: A Comprehensive Audit and Analysis.

This detailed article presents a comprehensive overview of the initial two-year experience in establishing a new cardiothoracic vascular surgery (CTVS) facility in a tier-2 city in India. The article discusses various aspects of setting up and operating a specialized healthcare facility. The first two years of developing the CTVS facility were included in the study period. The manpower included one cardiothoracic vascular surgeon, one cardiac anesthesiologist, two perfusionists, and two physician assistants, along with four other ancillary staff to assist in the smooth functioning of the operation theater. The CTVS recovery staff included 15 nursing officers. There was only one modular operation theater reserved for cardiothoracic vascular surgeries, along with a five-bed recovery room (CTVS intensive care unit). One-hundred-seventy-two procedures were done, including 122 open heart surgeries, 36 vascular procedures, and 14 thoracic procedures. The majority of patients were discharged by the seventh day postoperatively. Overall complication and mortality rates were 8% and 4.6%, respectively. This article also discusses relevant hospital policy, challenges faced, and future recommendations for similar endeavors. The findings highlight the successful implementation of the facility and its impact on providing specialized cardiac care to the local population.

The Challenge of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Indian Healthcare System.

The emergence and rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pose a grave threat to public health globally, and particularly so in India. With its unique combination of a dense population, a significant disease burden, and diverse healthcare practices, India stands at a critical juncture in the global battle against AMR. The implications of this escalating crisis are far-reaching, threatening decades of medical progress, undermining healthcare delivery, and posing potential roadblocks to the realization of several Sustainable Development Goals. AMR is a crisis within the Indian healthcare system as it severely hampers the effective treatment of infectious diseases, leading to higher mortality rates, longer hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Its rise could mark the return of the pre-antibiotic era, where common infections and minor surgeries could once again become life-threatening. Addressing the challenge of AMR in India requires a comprehensive, multifaceted, and well-coordinated response. From creating strong regulatory frameworks for antibiotic usage and improving diagnostic capabilities to fostering greater public awareness and promoting research into new antimicrobials, the strategies need to be as diverse and interconnected as the problem itself. This editorial will delve into the specificities of the AMR challenge within the Indian healthcare system, discuss potential strategies for mitigating the crisis, and evaluate the broader implications for public health and national policy. It will also highlight why India's response to this global health threat is crucial not only for the country but for the world at large.

Changing Trend in the Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Klebsiella Pneumonia Isolated From Endotracheal Aspirate Samples of ICU Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India.

Introduction Klebsiella pneumonia is one of the most prevalent bacteria that cause nosocomial infections, particularly in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Multi-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (MDRKP) has become an urgent risk to public health as its prevalence has sharply surged around the globe in recent decades. Therefore, this research was conducted to evaluate shifts over a four-year period in drug susceptibility patterns among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Materials and methods This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care multi-specialty hospital and teaching institute in North India and was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The research comprised Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from endotracheal aspirates (ETA) of patients on mechanical ventilation admitted to the general intensive care unit (ICU) of our tertiary care facility. The data from January to June 2018 and January to June 2022 were collected. According to the antimicrobial resistance profile of the strains, they were categorized as susceptible, resistant to one or two antimicrobial categories, multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), or pan-drug-resistant (PDR). The criteria for MDR, XDR, and PDR were proposed by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, Version 24.0, Armonk, NY, IBM Corp., was used for data input and analysis. Results A total of 82 cases of Klebsiella pneumonia were included in the study. Of these 82 isolates, 40 were isolated over a period of six months from January to June 2018, and the remaining 42 were isolated from January to June 2022. Among the 2018 group, five strains (12.5%) were classified as susceptible, three (7.5%) as resistant, seven (17.5%) as MDR, and 25 (62.5%) as XDR. The highest percentages of antimicrobial resistance in the 2018 group were observed with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (90%), ciprofloxacin (100%), piperacillin/tazobactam (92.5%), and cefoperazone/sulbactam (95%). In comparison, the 2022 group showed no strain as susceptible; nine strains (21.4%) were classified as resistant; three strains (7%) as MDR; and 30 strains (93%) were classified as XDR. There was a significant increase in resistance to amoxicillin, from 10% in 2018 to nil in 2022. Overall, the rate of resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumonia) increased from 7.5% (3/40) in 2018 to 21.4% (9/42) in 2022, while XDR Klebsiella pneumonia among the mechanically ventilated ICU patients significantly increased from 62.5% (25/40) in 2018 to 71% (30/42) in 2022. Conclusion  K. pneumoniae antibiotic resistance is a real threat in Asia and requires close monitoring to be controlled. More careful attempts should be made to create a new generation of antimicrobials since the prevalence of resistance to existing medications is rising. Antibiotic resistance should be monitored and reported by healthcare institutions regularly.

A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Long-Course Conventional Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy with Delayed Surgery in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Background Polish and Australian randomized studies compared short-course radiotherapy (RT) with immediate surgery and long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with delayed surgery. In these studies, similar long-term survival and local control have been reported for both these approaches, but pathological complete response (pCR) is not better with short-course RT. Moreover, studies have shown better tumor downstaging with delayed surgery. In this context, the use of short-course RT with delayed surgery may have some advantages and needs to be tested in clinical trials. Patients and Methods This was a two-arm, prospective, observational study, in which preoperative short-course RT followed by two cycles of chemotherapy was compared with the conventional neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. The primary end points were the rate of complete response and toxicity profile. The secondary end points were the rate of R0 resection, overall survival, and progression-free survival. The data obtained from the two arms were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test to determine the statistical significance between the two treatment arms. Results The pCR rate was 6.7% in the study arm and 0 in the control arm ( p = 0.343). The RO resection rates were 92.8 and 92.3% in the study and control arms, respectively. The rates of grade 3and 4 acute toxicity in the study and control arms were 14.2 and 61.5%, respectively ( p = 0.011). The rates of grade 3 and 4 late toxicity in the study and control arms were 21.4 and 15.3%, respectively ( p = 0.686). Conclusions The pCR rates and the late toxicities in both arms are comparable. The major advantages of the 5 × 5 Gy regimen with chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting are a significant reduction in acute toxicities and better patient compliance along with similar efficacy as that of the standard regimen.